Have any convicted paedophiles, rapists, sex molesters etc have a known history with pedobots or sexbots? I haven't and couldn't be bothered to look, but with killers theres a history of violence and torture (usually), so is there any convicted felon who has a history of sexbot use? If not...this is all conjecture.
One of the Japanese developers of a child rape robot is a paedophile himself. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51330261 - and it's not like child rapists are going to admit they're child rapists when purchasing the bots...It's been a while since I read through the sources, tbh not sure if I can face doing it again, but will see what I can turn up later.
Should probably be a registry for anyone who purchases such a doll. And if men are inclined to rape children and a doll prevents that from happening, then this is a positive development right? But yeah...this opens up all sorts of icky moral and ethical dilemmas. Self identified pedos by pornbots.
Child rape bots weren't invented as therapy tools - no pornbots were invented for therapy, they were invented by the porn trade. The whole marketing point of the porn trade is to get people (mainly men) porn soaked and addicted to the dopamine hit of watching porn or in this case using pornbots. That's how they make their money. Using child rape bots doesn't prevent child rape happening, that's what every source I've read is saying - the only ones claiming otherwise are paedophiles and those in the porn trade.
With the human brain, practice always makes perfect. And if paedos are claiming they only think about it and were only caught with those 500 child rape images that one time ... Well as one police officer once said to me (re unethical behaviour generally) "Nobody is EVER caught the first time".
And (re online criminal or unethical proclivities) "Always look for a contact offence."
Thought precedes action and more thought amplifies desire to act. They "might" be a substitute for some people, but as you wrote, it is not the intended purpose so that could be considered an "off lable" use.
Yes indeed, there's lots of evidence that practice really does make perfect - and none of any therapeutic value. But provided they stay indoors playing with their dollies, that works for me!
Tell it like it is, sister!!!
Agree so here's my but...
Have any convicted paedophiles, rapists, sex molesters etc have a known history with pedobots or sexbots? I haven't and couldn't be bothered to look, but with killers theres a history of violence and torture (usually), so is there any convicted felon who has a history of sexbot use? If not...this is all conjecture.
One of the Japanese developers of a child rape robot is a paedophile himself. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-51330261 - and it's not like child rapists are going to admit they're child rapists when purchasing the bots...It's been a while since I read through the sources, tbh not sure if I can face doing it again, but will see what I can turn up later.
Should probably be a registry for anyone who purchases such a doll. And if men are inclined to rape children and a doll prevents that from happening, then this is a positive development right? But yeah...this opens up all sorts of icky moral and ethical dilemmas. Self identified pedos by pornbots.
Child rape bots weren't invented as therapy tools - no pornbots were invented for therapy, they were invented by the porn trade. The whole marketing point of the porn trade is to get people (mainly men) porn soaked and addicted to the dopamine hit of watching porn or in this case using pornbots. That's how they make their money. Using child rape bots doesn't prevent child rape happening, that's what every source I've read is saying - the only ones claiming otherwise are paedophiles and those in the porn trade.
With the human brain, practice always makes perfect. And if paedos are claiming they only think about it and were only caught with those 500 child rape images that one time ... Well as one police officer once said to me (re unethical behaviour generally) "Nobody is EVER caught the first time".
And (re online criminal or unethical proclivities) "Always look for a contact offence."
Thought precedes action and more thought amplifies desire to act. They "might" be a substitute for some people, but as you wrote, it is not the intended purpose so that could be considered an "off lable" use.
Yes indeed, there's lots of evidence that practice really does make perfect - and none of any therapeutic value. But provided they stay indoors playing with their dollies, that works for me!
Of. Can't fix the typo on my phone...